Prep Right
Debates › Economy, growth and trade
Debate #316 of 447

Did Pakistan's 1960s growth-first model justify its cost in inequality?

Asked in 2 years · 2002–2003Appears in:Economics
Outline a past question
This debate All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsPast questions (2)Same themeIs IMF lending a debt trap or a path to recovery for Pakistan?Can Pakistan's industrial sector drive growth and absorb its labour force?Should Pakistan shift its tax burden from indirect to direct taxes?

In short

Examiners want
functional inequality strategy, 22 families, growth-equity trade-off, 1970s paradigm shift, evidence-based verdict
Last asked
2003 · CSS Economics · Discuss"The debate on 'growth and equity' trade-off that ensued in the second half of the 1960s, was largely responsible for the subsequent paradigm shift. However, the economic and… Outline it
Positions
No argument map yet.

Positions

No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked.

Past questions 2

  1. 00
  2. 01
  3. 02
  4. 03
  5. 04
  6. 05
  7. 06
  8. 07
  9. 08
  10. 09
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. 15
  17. 16
  18. 17
  19. 18
  20. 19
  21. 20
  22. 21
  23. 22
  24. 23
  25. 24
  26. 25
  27. 26
Show all 2 questions
2003
CSS · Economics · Discuss

"The debate on 'growth and equity' trade-off that ensued in the second half of the 1960s, was largely responsible for the subsequent paradigm shift. However, the economic and social indicators in the 1970s, scarcely justified the latter". Discuss.

asks for: causes
Outline itOpen the paper
(20)
2002
CSS · Economics · Question

The policy of "financial inequality" in the sixties, transformed the economic structure and social order in Pakistan. Substantiate with facts and logical conclusions, whether you agree or otherwise.

asks for: give evidence · Pakistan link
Outline itOpen the paper