Prep Right
Debate #206 of 447

Has rising non-state power made state-centric security thinking obsolete?

Asked in 3 years · 2016–2026Appears in:International Relations
This debate All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsPast questions (3)Same themeHas the global war on terror reduced or intensified the terrorist threat?Is Pakistan's terrorism threat primarily homegrown or externally sponsored?Is radicalisation in Pakistan driven more by ideology or by socio-economic grievance?

In short

Examiners want
traditional state security versus global and human security, non-state actors' growing role, how far the shift goes
Last asked
2026 · CSS International Relations · AnalyseAnalyse how the scope of International Relations has expanded with the rise of non-state actors in global politics. Outline it
Positions
No argument map yet.

Positions

No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked.

Past questions 3

  1. 00
  2. 01
  3. 02
  4. 03
  5. 04
  6. 05
  7. 06
  8. 07
  9. 08
  10. 09
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. 15
  17. 16
  18. 17
  19. 18
  20. 19
  21. 20
  22. 21
  23. 22
  24. 23
  25. 24
  26. 25
  27. 26
Show all 3 questions
2026
CSS · International Relations · Analyse

Analyse how the scope of International Relations has expanded with the rise of non-state actors in global politics.

(20)
2023
CCE Sindh · International Relations · Explain

How does the rise of non-state actors, such as multinational corporations and international organizations, challenge the traditional state-centric focus of International Relations?

(20)
2016
CSS · International Relations · Take a position

What is the significance of Security to states? How far do you agree that international security has given way to global security in face of new challenges of Terrorism and Human Security?

asks for: your position · a way forward · impact
(20)