Analyze Pakistan-US relations in the aftermath of the 9/11 incident. How do you see the prospects for cooperation between Pakistan and the US particularly after the change of Government in Afghanistan?
Debate #60 of 447
Has the alliance with the United States served Pakistan's interests more than it cost?
Appears in:International RelationsPakistan AffairsHistory of Pakistan & India+1
This debate
All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsPast questions (5)Same themeDid the US war in Afghanistan stabilise the region or destabilise Pakistan?Was Pakistan's Cold War alignment with America driven by security or ideology?Is US interventionism a source of global disorder rather than order?In short
- Examiners want
- historical phases, asymmetry of obligations, aid and dependence, post-9/11 trade-offs, both sides, future prospects and policy recommendations
- Last asked
- Analyze Pakistan-US relations in the aftermath of the 9/11 incident. How do you see the prospects for cooperation between Pakistan and the US particularly after the change of… Outline it
- Positions
- No argument map yet.
Positions
No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked.
Past questions
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Show all 5 questions
2021
asks for: Pakistan link · outlook
2016
Write note on the post 9/11 foreign policy of Pakistan. What role do you foresee for Pakistan in regional and global politics in the near future?
asks for: Pakistan link · outlook
(20)
2015
Discuss in length Pakistan’s relations with the United States in historical perspective. What future do you foresee for Pakistan’s alliance with the United States in the ongoing Global War on Terror?
asks for: Pakistan link · background · outlook
(20)
2009
Critically evaluate American Foreign Policy towards Pakistan.
asks for: both sides · Pakistan link
(20)
2003
In the current relationship of mutual dependence, American obligations arc minimal while Piikistani ones are substantial Comment.
asks for: your position
(20)