Globalization and National Economies.
Is globalisation irreversible, or is nationalist backlash reasserting state control over economies?
This debate
All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsEvidence (2)Past questions (5)Same themeHas the United Nations been sidelined as guarantor of international peace and security?Does WTO-led economic globalisation benefit or exploit developing countries like Pakistan?Does international law effectively constrain the conduct of powerful states?In short
- Examiners want
- Globalisation's effect on state autonomy and inequality, rise of populism and anti-globalisation (Brexit, protectionism), state capacity to resist, implications for national economies
- Last asked
- Globalization and National Economies. Outline it
- Positions
- No argument map yet.
Positions
No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked. 2 evidence cards already cite this debate.
Evidence you can cite
Past questions
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Show all 5 questions
Is Globalization an irreversible process? Do states have the capacity to resist the forces of globalization or their survival and economic benefits require an unconditional submission?
Has nationalism been the most common cause of conflict in the post-Cold War era? Accordingly, point out the reasons for the rise of populism and anti-globalization wave in this regard.
Globalization restrict the autonomy of the state, generates domestic social conflicts, and inequalities. Discuss the interactions between globalization and domestic politics.
Brexit means globalization is the rhetoric of the privileged, and capitalism will return ferociously as ever.