Prep Right
Debates › India and Kashmir
Debate #329 of 447

Was Kashmir's accession to India legally valid?

Asked in 2 years · 2002–2003Appears in:Pakistan Affairs
Outline a past question
This debate All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsPast questions (2)Same themeCan dialogue deliver sustained peace between Pakistan and India?Can Pakistan counter Indian regional dominance by balancing China and the US?Has Pakistan's Kashmir policy succeeded or failed?

In short

Examiners want
Instrument of Accession, comparison with Junagadh and Hyderabad, consent of the people, India's position against Pakistan's
Last asked
2003 · CSS Pakistan Affairs · ExplainThe so-called 'Instrument of Accession' of Bharat with Kashmir "is fraudulent and impossible to accept" as it is "based on violence". In the light of the Quaid-i-Azan's statement… Outline it
Positions
No argument map yet.

Positions

No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked.

Past questions 2

  1. 00
  2. 01
  3. 02
  4. 03
  5. 04
  6. 05
  7. 06
  8. 07
  9. 08
  10. 09
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. 15
  17. 16
  18. 17
  19. 18
  20. 19
  21. 20
  22. 21
  23. 22
  24. 23
  25. 24
  26. 25
  27. 26
Show all 2 questions
2003
CSS · Pakistan Affairs · Explain

The so-called 'Instrument of Accession' of Bharat with Kashmir "is fraudulent and impossible to accept" as it is "based on violence". In the light of the Quaid-i-Azan's statement make a comparison and correlation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir with the State of Junagadh, Manavadhar, Mangrol, Sardargarh, Bantva and Hyderabad etc.

asks for: give evidence
Outline itOpen the paper
(20)
2002
CSS · Pakistan Affairs · Explain

The Indian Policy on Kashmir is caught on the horns of a dilemma and that dilemma is that if it accepts the verdict of the people, it has to vacate the territory of state of Junagarh, Manavadhar, Mangrol, Hyderabad etc. Explain.

Outline itOpen the paper
(20)