2005
Mahmud of Ghazna, it is generally believed had face to the west and back to the east and thus heeded less to the making of an empire in the sub-continent. Comment.
asks for: your position
(20)
Debate #427 of 447
Was Mahmud of Ghazna a raider or an empire-builder in the subcontinent?
Appears in:History of Pakistan & India
This debate
All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsPast questions (1)Same themeWas Balban's reign defined by internal consolidation rather than territorial expansion?Was Iltutmish the real founder of the Delhi Sultanate?Was Muhammad bin Tughlaq a visionary reformer or the cause of his dynasty's decline?In short
- Examiners want
- Motives of Mahmud's invasions, Central Asian priorities, annexation of Punjab, judgement on imperial intent
- Last asked
- Mahmud of Ghazna, it is generally believed had face to the west and back to the east and thus heeded less to the making of an empire in the sub-continent. Comment. Outline it
- Positions
- No argument map yet.
Positions
No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked.
Past questions
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26