Prep Right
Debates › World order, UN and great-power politics
Debate #296 of 447

Are globalisation and regionalism antagonistic or complementary forces?

Asked in 2 years · 2002–2020Appears in:Political ScienceInternational Relations
Outline a past question
This debate All debatesIn shortPositionsNewsPast questions (2)Same themeHas the United Nations been sidelined as guarantor of international peace and security?Does WTO-led economic globalisation benefit or exploit developing countries like Pakistan?Is globalisation irreversible, or is nationalist backlash reasserting state control over economies?

In short

Examiners want
Definitions in brief, regional blocs as adaptation or resistance to globalisation, examples such as EU, ASEAN, SAARC, assessment of the relationship
Last asked
2020 · CSS Political Science · DiscussDiscuss the way in which globalization could promote regionalization as an adaptation. Outline it
Positions
No argument map yet.

Positions

No argument map yet. Chains appear when evidence for this debate is linked.

Past questions 2

  1. 00
  2. 01
  3. 02
  4. 03
  5. 04
  6. 05
  7. 06
  8. 07
  9. 08
  10. 09
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. 15
  17. 16
  18. 17
  19. 18
  20. 19
  21. 20
  22. 21
  23. 22
  24. 23
  25. 24
  26. 25
  27. 26
Show all 2 questions
2020
CSS · Political Science · Discuss

Discuss the way in which globalization could promote regionalization as an adaptation.

Outline itOpen the paper
(20)
2002
CSS · International Relations · Take a position

“Globalization” and “Regionalism”. Do you think these terms are antagonistic or complementary? Give examples in your arguments.

asks for: give evidence · your position
Outline itOpen the paper
(20)